My walk was the walk of a human child, but my heart was a tree.

One day, some people met a thundersquirrel. This is their true story.

12/30/09 04:26 am - [info]hitchhiker - avatar

Just saw Avatar. On the whole, an enjoyable movie - the visuals were spectacular, and have truly redefined the limits of CGI, and the plot was thin but better than I was fearing.

Visuals first - I've seen a scattered handful of 3d movies so far, but this was the first one that really worked for me. The 3d wasn't in any way highlighted; it was just *there*, another tool in the cinematographer's toolbox. The alien creatures, both humanoid and animal, were excellent; there were very few places that I got the feeling that nature would never evolve anything quite that clunky (whereas, for instance, the Star Wars prequels made me feel that way *throughout*). Some of the creatures - particular the more exotic plants - did strike me as a bit too cartoony or too Chihulyesque, but overall the alien planet *worked*; it was immersive and struck just the right balance between spectacularly impressive and suitably unobtrusive.

SF-wise it struck me as a very golden-age sort of tale - the obvious Call Me Joe reference, of course, but also the whole "greedy corporation despoiling a helpless planet" bit. The "noble savage" theme was definitely present, but not nearly as overdone as I'd feared going in; the references to an active Gaiology that the Na'vi were plugged into leavened it a fair bit. Also, I really didn't get the "natives waiting for a white man to come in and solve their problems" vibe from it. I was reminded more of Schmitz's "Balanced Ecology" [I'd quote the last paragraph of it but it's a spoiler for the story if not the movie, and it's short - go read it]. It was rather blatant that our hero, in the space of three short months, outdid the Na'vi at their own game and rose to become a leader among them - I really wish the story had had him be valuable for the unique *human* contribution he could bring to the table, rather than because he somehow was a better Na'vi than most Na'vi - but I can't really single out Avatar here; that's one of the commonest tropes around. The *combination* of this trope and the fact that there is a clear "technologically dominant culture" parallel between the scenario and various historical conflicts is what lends it uncomfortably racist overtones, but I can't see how either of them could have been omitted without significantly raising the sophistication of the movie and possibly even effecting a qualitative change in the kind of movie it is.

I did have one problem with the plot, or at any rate the resolution - this spoilery comment sums it up exactly and explains it better than I could. But that simply made the ending a bit more downbeat for me than was perhaps intended; it wasn't a flaw in the movie per se.

I realise that several people on my friendslist have had serious philosophical problems with racist and sexist overtones in the movie, so I won't recommend it unreservedly, but I will say that I enjoyed it.

12/29/09 07:18 pm - [info]mlfoley

( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )
 

12/30/09 12:17 am - [info]shavianwikinews - ๐‘•๐‘ฉ๐‘ฅ๐‘ญ๐‘ค๐‘ฐ ๐‘๐‘ฒ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฉ๐‘‘๐‘• ๐‘’๐‘จ๐‘๐‘—๐‘ป ๐‘‘๐‘ต ๐‘–๐‘ฆ๐‘๐‘•

๐‘‘๐‘ฟ๐‘Ÿ๐‘›๐‘ฑ, ๐‘›๐‘ฆ๐‘•๐‘ง๐‘ฅ๐‘š๐‘ผ 29, 2009

๐‘๐‘ฒ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฉ๐‘‘๐‘• ๐‘“๐‘ฎ๐‘ช๐‘ฅ ๐‘•๐‘ฉ๐‘ฅ๐‘ญ๐‘ค๐‘ฐ๐‘ฉ ๐‘ฃ๐‘จ๐‘ ๐‘’๐‘จ๐‘๐‘—๐‘ป๐‘› ๐‘‘๐‘ต ๐‘–๐‘ฆ๐‘๐‘• ๐‘ฆ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ž ๐‘œ๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘“ ๐‘ ๐‘ฑ๐‘›๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ช๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฅ๐‘ณ๐‘ฏ๐‘›๐‘ฑ. ๐‘ž ๐‘–๐‘ฆ๐‘๐‘• ๐‘”๐‘ท๐‘‘ ๐‘‘ ๐‘š๐‘ฐ ๐‘’๐‘จ๐‘๐‘—๐‘ป๐‘› ๐‘ธ ๐‘ž ๐‘š๐‘ฎ๐‘ฆ๐‘‘๐‘ฆ๐‘– ๐‘ด๐‘ฏ๐‘› ๐‘•๐‘‘๐‘ฎ๐‘ฐ๐‘‘ ยท๐‘ก๐‘ฑ๐‘ฅ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘๐‘ธ๐‘’ ๐‘’๐‘ง๐‘ฅ๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘ฉ๐‘ค ๐‘‘๐‘จ๐‘™๐‘’๐‘ป, ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ž ๐‘๐‘จ๐‘ฏ๐‘ฉ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฑ๐‘ฏ๐‘ฐ๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ Navios Apollon ๐‘’๐‘ญ๐‘ฎ๐‘œ๐‘ด ๐‘–๐‘ฆ๐‘. ๐‘ž๐‘ฆ๐‘• ๐‘š๐‘ฎ๐‘ฆ๐‘™๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ž ๐‘‘๐‘ด๐‘‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ค ๐‘ฏ๐‘ณ๐‘ฅ๐‘š๐‘ผ ๐‘ ๐‘–๐‘ฆ๐‘๐‘• ๐‘š๐‘ฐ๐‘ฆ๐‘™ ๐‘ฃ๐‘ง๐‘ค๐‘› ๐‘š๐‘ฒ ๐‘ž ๐‘๐‘ฒ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฉ๐‘‘๐‘• ๐‘‘ ๐‘‘๐‘ง๐‘ฏ. ๐‘ท๐‘ค๐‘•๐‘ด ๐‘ช๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฅ๐‘ณ๐‘ฏ๐‘›๐‘ฑ, ๐‘๐‘ฒ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฉ๐‘‘๐‘• ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฆ๐‘ค๐‘ฐ๐‘•๐‘‘ ๐‘ฉ ๐‘•๐‘ฆ๐‘™๐‘ฉ๐‘๐‘ช๐‘ฎ-๐‘ด๐‘ฏ๐‘› ๐‘’๐‘ญ๐‘ฎ๐‘œ๐‘ด ๐‘–๐‘ฆ๐‘, ๐‘ž Kota Wajar, ๐‘“๐‘น ๐‘ณ๐‘•$4 ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฆ๐‘ค๐‘˜๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ (โ‚ฌ2.7m, ยฃ2.5m) ๐‘ฎ๐‘จ๐‘ฏ๐‘•๐‘ฉ๐‘ฅ.

๐‘ž ๐‘๐‘ฒ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฉ๐‘‘ ๐‘’๐‘ฉ๐‘ฅ๐‘ญ๐‘ฏ๐‘›๐‘ผ ๐‘ฅ๐‘ด๐‘ฃ๐‘ญ๐‘ฅ๐‘ง๐‘› ๐‘–๐‘จ๐‘’๐‘ฆ๐‘ฎ ๐‘‘๐‘ด๐‘ค๐‘› ๐‘ž ๐‘‘๐‘ฒ๐‘ฅ๐‘Ÿ โ€œ๐‘ข๐‘ฐ ๐‘ฃ๐‘จ๐‘ ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฒ๐‘ก๐‘จ๐‘’๐‘‘ ๐‘ฉ ๐‘–๐‘ฆ๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘ฆ๐‘ž [๐‘ฉ] ๐‘š๐‘ฎ๐‘ฆ๐‘‘๐‘ฆ๐‘– ๐‘“๐‘ค๐‘จ๐‘œ ๐‘ฆ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ž ๐‘œ๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘“ ๐‘ ๐‘ฑ๐‘›๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ค๐‘ฑ๐‘‘ ๐‘˜๐‘ง๐‘•๐‘‘๐‘ผ๐‘›๐‘ฑ, ๐‘ข๐‘ฐ ๐‘ฃ๐‘จ๐‘ ๐‘๐‘ฐ๐‘•๐‘“๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘ฆ ๐‘’๐‘จ๐‘๐‘—๐‘ป๐‘› ๐‘ž ๐‘–๐‘ฆ๐‘ ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฏ๐‘ด ๐‘–๐‘ช๐‘‘๐‘• ๐‘ข๐‘ป ๐‘“๐‘ฒ๐‘ผ๐‘› ๐‘ฏ [๐‘ž๐‘บ ๐‘ธ] ๐‘ฏ๐‘ด ๐‘’๐‘จ๐‘ ๐‘ฉ๐‘ข๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘‘๐‘ฐ๐‘Ÿ.โ€ ๐‘ž ๐‘•๐‘‘๐‘ฎ๐‘ฐ๐‘‘ ยท๐‘ก๐‘ฑ๐‘ฅ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘๐‘ธ๐‘’'๐‘• ๐‘ด๐‘ฏ๐‘ผ ๐‘Ÿ๐‘ด๐‘›๐‘ฐ๐‘จ๐‘’ ๐‘ฅ๐‘ง๐‘ฎ๐‘ฉ๐‘‘๐‘ฒ๐‘ฅ ๐‘ฑ๐‘ก๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ๐‘•๐‘ฆ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฆ๐‘ค๐‘ฐ๐‘•๐‘‘ ๐‘ฉ ๐‘•๐‘‘๐‘ฑ๐‘‘๐‘ฅ๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ๐‘‘ ๐‘•๐‘ฑ๐‘ฆ๐‘™ ๐‘ž๐‘จ๐‘‘ ๐‘ฏ๐‘ณ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ ๐‘ž ๐‘’๐‘ฎ๐‘ต ๐‘ฃ๐‘จ๐‘› ๐‘š๐‘ฐ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฆ๐‘ฏ๐‘ก๐‘ป๐‘› ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ž๐‘จ๐‘‘ ๐‘ž๐‘ฑ ๐‘ธ ๐‘ข๐‘ป๐‘’๐‘ฆ๐‘™ ๐‘‘ ๐‘œ๐‘ง๐‘‘ ๐‘ž ๐‘’๐‘ฎ๐‘ต ๐‘ฅ๐‘ง๐‘ฅ๐‘š๐‘ผ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฆ๐‘ค๐‘ฐ๐‘•๐‘‘.

๐‘ฅ๐‘น...
 

12/30/09 12:17 am - [info]shavianwikinews - ๐‘ฉ๐‘๐‘ง๐‘ฏ๐‘ก๐‘› ๐‘•๐‘ง๐‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ๐‘“๐‘ด๐‘ค๐‘› ๐‘›๐‘ฎ๐‘ฉ๐‘ฅ๐‘ป ยท๐‘ก๐‘ฑ๐‘ฅ๐‘Ÿ โ€œ๐‘ž ๐‘ฎ๐‘ง๐‘โ€ ๐‘•๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘ฉ๐‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ ๐‘“๐‘ฌ๐‘ฏ๐‘› ๐‘›๐‘ง๐‘› ๐‘ฑ๐‘ก 28

๐‘‘๐‘ฟ๐‘Ÿ๐‘›๐‘ฑ, ๐‘›๐‘ฆ๐‘•๐‘ง๐‘ฅ๐‘š๐‘ผ 29, 2009

๐‘ž ๐‘›๐‘ฎ๐‘ฉ๐‘ฅ๐‘ป ๐‘ ๐‘ฅ๐‘ง๐‘‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ค ๐‘’๐‘ด๐‘ฎ ๐‘ฎ๐‘ช๐‘’ ๐‘š๐‘จ๐‘ฏ๐‘› ๐‘ฉ๐‘๐‘ง๐‘ฏ๐‘ก๐‘› ๐‘•๐‘ง๐‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ๐‘“๐‘ด๐‘ค๐‘›, ยท๐‘ก๐‘ฑ๐‘ฅ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ด๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ ๐‘•๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘ฉ๐‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ, ๐‘ฃ๐‘จ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘š๐‘ฐ๐‘ฏ ๐‘“๐‘ฌ๐‘ฏ๐‘› ๐‘›๐‘ง๐‘› ๐‘จ๐‘‘ ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฆ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘’๐‘จ๐‘ค๐‘ฉ๐‘“๐‘ช๐‘ฎ๐‘ฏ๐‘˜๐‘ฉ ๐‘ฃ๐‘ด๐‘ฅ ๐‘ค๐‘ด๐‘’๐‘ฑ๐‘‘๐‘ฉ๐‘› ๐‘ฆ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ž ๐‘ฟ๐‘ฏ๐‘ฒ๐‘‘๐‘ฉ๐‘› ๐‘•๐‘‘๐‘ฑ๐‘‘๐‘•. ๐‘•๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘ฉ๐‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ, ๐‘š๐‘ง๐‘‘๐‘ผ ๐‘ฏ๐‘ด๐‘ฏ ๐‘จ๐‘Ÿ "๐‘ž ๐‘ฎ๐‘ง๐‘," ๐‘ข๐‘ช๐‘Ÿ ๐‘“๐‘ฌ๐‘ฏ๐‘› ๐‘›๐‘ง๐‘› ๐‘ช๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฅ๐‘ณ๐‘ฏ๐‘›๐‘ฑ ๐‘จ๐‘‘ ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฆ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ฃ๐‘ด๐‘ฅ ๐‘ฆ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฃ๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ๐‘‘๐‘ฆ๐‘™๐‘‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ ๐‘š๐‘ฐ๐‘— ๐‘จ๐‘‘ ๐‘ฉ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฌ๐‘ฏ๐‘› 1:00 ๐‘๐‘ฐ.๐‘ง๐‘ฅ. (PST). ๐‘ฆ๐‘‘ ๐‘ฆ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘š๐‘ฆ๐‘ค๐‘ฐ๐‘๐‘› ๐‘ž๐‘จ๐‘‘ ๐‘ž 28-๐‘˜๐‘ฝ-๐‘ด๐‘ค๐‘› ๐‘›๐‘ฒ๐‘› ๐‘ ๐‘ฏ๐‘จ๐‘—๐‘ผ๐‘ฉ๐‘ค ๐‘’๐‘ท๐‘Ÿ๐‘ฉ๐‘Ÿ.

๐‘•๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘ฉ๐‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ข๐‘ช๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ข๐‘ณ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ ๐‘ž ๐‘“๐‘ถ๐‘ฏ๐‘›๐‘ฆ๐‘™ ๐‘ฅ๐‘ง๐‘ฅ๐‘š๐‘ผ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ ๐‘ฉ๐‘๐‘ง๐‘ฏ๐‘ก๐‘› ๐‘•๐‘ง๐‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏ๐‘“๐‘ด๐‘ค๐‘› ๐‘ข๐‘ง๐‘ฏ ๐‘ž ๐‘œ๐‘ฎ๐‘ต๐‘ ๐‘›๐‘ฑ๐‘š๐‘˜๐‘ต๐‘› ๐‘ฆ๐‘ฏ 1999. ๐‘ž ๐‘œ๐‘ฎ๐‘ต๐‘ ๐‘ฉ๐‘—๐‘ฐ๐‘๐‘› ๐‘ฏ๐‘ช๐‘‘๐‘ฉ๐‘š๐‘ฉ๐‘ค ๐‘•๐‘ฉ๐‘’๐‘•๐‘ง๐‘• ๐‘ข๐‘ง๐‘ฏ ๐‘ž๐‘ฑ ๐‘ข๐‘ณ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ž MTV ๐‘š๐‘ง๐‘•๐‘‘ ๐‘ฏ๐‘ฟ ๐‘ญ๐‘‘๐‘ฆ๐‘•๐‘‘ ๐‘ฉ๐‘ข๐‘ช๐‘ฎ๐‘› ๐‘ฆ๐‘ฏ 2006. ๐‘ž ๐‘œ๐‘ฎ๐‘ต๐‘ ๐‘ข๐‘ช๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฆ๐‘๐‘ช๐‘ฎ๐‘‘๐‘ฉ๐‘›๐‘ค๐‘ฐ ๐‘ข๐‘ป๐‘’๐‘ฆ๐‘™ ๐‘ช๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฉ ๐‘“๐‘ฆ๐‘“๐‘” ๐‘จ๐‘ค๐‘š๐‘ณ๐‘ฅ ๐‘จ๐‘‘ ๐‘ž ๐‘‘๐‘ฒ๐‘ฅ ๐‘ ๐‘•๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘ฉ๐‘๐‘ฉ๐‘ฏโ€™๐‘• ๐‘›๐‘ง๐‘”.

๐‘ฅ๐‘น...

12/29/09 03:36 pm - [info]kyburg - I can't believe it.

( You are about to view content that may not be appropriate for minors. )

12/29/09 06:31 pm - [info]realinterrobang - Quotes, Putting the Faux in Folkways Edition

It's staggering, the extent to which parents are now having to trade off their own values against the commercial interest of companies. Today's marketing assigns simple and very separate roles to boys and girls, and whips up peer pressure to police the difference. ... it's no exaggeration to talk of a gender apartheid.
-- Ed Mayo, quoted in The Guardian

The right has shown repeatedly that they'll gladly move the goalposts of what's considered "left" to just outside the gates John Birch Society.
-- darrelplant, First Draft, comments

Based on talking with right-wingers, I'm pretty sure they feel strongly that no one -- not the government, not the Gates Foundation, not tiny little local charities, not a donation jar at the corner coffee shop -- no one should make it easier for people to get health care. The reason why hasn't ever been clear, but it's been very clear that they feel people should somehow take care of these little heart bypasses and cancer ops and so on by themselves, somehow, and certainly without the help of principled conservatives. I've been trying to find the right adjectives. Bloodthirsty doesn't really work; uncaring is too weak; selfish is an understatement too. Vicious?
-- fleas correct the era, Hullabaloo, comments

We had a Unibomber; now we have the Undiesbomber.
-- Jennifer, Sadly, No!, comments

The GOP has become one of those movies where if you've seen the trailer, you've seen the whole thing.
-- Beltane, Balloon Juice, comments

Big Pharma hates vaccines. They've been leaving the vaccine manufacturing business. Why? Vaccines are cheap and make the companies little money compared to infectious diseases and their consequences. An aunt of mine contracted polio as a child. Growing up and throughout the remainder of her long life, she was a metaphorical license to print money for drug and medical supply companies. Ka-Ching. Ka-Ching. Ka-Ching. On the other hand, I was vaccinated against polio, will never get polio, and will never need the services that my aunt did. Big Pharma made a measly $15 dollars off me. Not much.
-- History Punk, Respectful Insolence, comments

Just because you don't understand the answer doesn't mean it's wrong.
-- Miki Z, Pharyngula, comments

Consumer culture is exploiting the disappearance and devaluation of feminism - actually, it even claims to replace it, by being a 'champion of girls' in some respects, all the while creating new and younger markets.
-- Angela McRobbie, quoted in The Guardian

...and what's this I keep hearing about sending AIDS to starving people in foreign countries? Don't they have enough problems already? ....Oh. Never mind.
-- Arno, Whiskey Fire, comments

For all the years weโ€™ve been lecturing the south about racism (not undeserved), no major southern city has ever been abandoned and left to rot because of a high, or even majority, population of the coloreds. My dad, who grew up in Atlanta in the 30โ€™s and 40โ€™s and was a bigot (though not of the violent white supremacist variety) always said that the difference in race relations between north and south was in the south, you could get (or live) as close as you like, just donโ€™t get too high (read: uppity), while in the north it was the reverse. I think there was something to that.
-- Jennifer, Sadly, No!, comments, on Detroit

Win an election, by hook or crook...and Republicans break all land-speed records to loot the place outright and tow the wreck of whatever is left the Impound Lot of History. Lose...and Republicans stand on the Overpass of History lobbing cinder blocks into traffic. And they can to this because they pay absolutely no penalty for; because their moral imbecile minions actual delight in it and rewards them for it. These millions of jerks -- the Pig People -- who giggle as the world melts. Who smirked as New Orleans drowned. Who reliably whine out the single biggest Big Lie in Modern American political history -- that "Liberals are just as bad" -- when they get cause red-handed gloating over the suffering of the poor and the weak in another fascist circle jerk of orgiastic sadism and misanthropy. These are the fruits of the 30 years Conservative Base Breeding program designed to produce a crop of berserker wingnuts who regard any Democratic Administration as de facto illegitimate, any Liberal as a dangerous internal enemy to be crushed, and even the most modest attempts to govern responsibly as something (and I am quoting now from a conversation I had recently with an otherwise-pleasant Conservative colleague) straight out "of some Marxist Central Planner's playbook!"
-- Driftglass, "Attack of the 50 Foot Mamzer," d r i f t g l a s s

Within a week after 9/11, some conservatives I know blamed it on Clinton. I assume it started on talk radio. Within a month, George Bush himself was blaming the attack on Clinton. Their aim is to alter the history books so that they say โ€œSome Democrats say that the 9/11 attacks occurred under president Bush, while Republicans argue โ€ฆ โ€ Iโ€™m pretty sure theyโ€™re going to be successful.
-- ds, Balloon Juice, comments

[I]f George Bush had spent the money on retrofitting all American airports to the standards of the Tel Aviv airport instead of squandering it on tax breaks for his rich buddies and waging a vanity war, things would be a lot safer for travelers.
-- Karen Zipdrive, distributorcap NY, comments [I might pay what El Al charges people flying out of Israel for their agent to come to my house, pack and inspect my things the night before, and issue me my boarding pass, so that all I had to do was clear security the next day, if it were available here. -- ?!]

As soon as I heard Obama refer to these "Cadillac plans" I immediately flashed back to the 80s and Reagan's "Welfare Queens."
-- roseroby, Shakesville, comments

Phase One: Bomb Underpants
Phase Two: ???
Phase Three: Profit! Terror!
-- Underpants Bombing Gnome, Sadly, No!, comments

Al Queda doesn't even need to blow up anything at this point. All they have to do is put some sad sack on a plane and have him set something on fire--and the conservative babies start screaming about how we're all gonna die.
-- doggril, Hullabaloo, comments

The typical unholy trinity of woo is "ignorant, confused and hostile".
-- Dangerous Bacon, Respectful Insolence, comments [Ignorant, confused, and hostile is no way to go through life, son. --?!]

Average salaries for a Washington DC police detective is about $60k. That's before bonuses, kickbacks, payoffs, shakedowns, bribes and unreported confiscations.
-- Abby Normal, Dispatches from the Culture Wars, comments

Working in IT, I know the importance of reading the documentation - and only my job depends on that. If I believed the stakes included either eternal bliss or eternal punishment, I'd damn well spend a few days reading the manual.
-- Moggie, Pharyngula, comments

[T]his is the same Republican party who said that Social Security would turn the US into a fascist state, who demagogued against Medicare by invoking a bleak post-apocalyptic landscape where doctors can't practice medicine, etc. And yet they consistently get about half of the vote in every federal election. Nothing they say can discredit them - they learned that a long time ago.
-- Corey, Balloon Juice, comments

We don't get to hide under our beds and flagellate ourselves over what WE could have done better, for the very simple reason that ain't nobody on a progressive blog cashing fat checks from Aetna while demonizing poor women on national TV and then going home to prime rib. I realize that some hippie somewhere maybe said something dumb to Joey's wife, but I'm saying that it does in fact matter who is right and who is wrong on this.
-- Athenae, "It's Always the Left's Fault," First Draft

Dateline August 2014: TSA announced today all passengers will be anesthetized before their flights so please arrive an hour early and donโ€™t bring a carry-on.
-- owlbear1, Sadly, No!, comments

One doesn't have to be "Progressive" or "Liberal" to oppose TORTURE, kidnapping & imprisonment without charges, or spying on all Americans.
-- Kathy W, Hullabaloo, comments

You aren't going to stop two horny, headstrong teenagers from banging each other. However, if you punish and ostracize them, they won't stop having sex -- they'll just keep quiet about it, and will likely NOT be getting comprehensive sex education, which means unwanted pregnancies and STDs. Stop punishing teens for being horny teens! Educate them, be there for them, tell them they should wait until they have grown a bit, but if they do decide to have sex, here's a pamphlet and here's a place you can get some condoms...
-- marilove, Dispatches from the Culture Wars, comments

I'm not sure how to articulate it, but it's a thread that binds together a lot of otherwise disparate issues -- if the government is going to build roads, they should be toll roads so you get to worry every morning as you locate enough quarters to pay to go to work; if we're going to have health reform, it has to be as expensive and ungenerous as possible, so you can now live in fear of both your insurer AND the IRS; if we're going to have unemployment insurance, the state has to contract some private firm to constantly hound you about applying for non-existent jobs. We are seemingly unwavering in our belief that we don't deserve happier, more civilized lives, and that saddens me deeply. But then, I don't believe that suffering is morally edifying. I'm in favor of more happiness and less suffering wherever possible, which is apparently a radical position.
-- KevinBaker, Shakesville, comments

There is nothing humble in believing one has an inside line to god. Sure, Christians talk about being "fallen" and "sinners", but what it's all about is false modesty: we're all fallen, but Christians get to be saved, and you don't.
-- PZ Myers, "I'm so sorry for you, Indiana," Pharyngula

Sadly, the neocon agenda is also alive and well up here in Canada. The current minority CONservative government is working as hard as possible to destoy our country from within, and most Canadians are simply standing back and watching them do it.
-- double nickel, d r i f t g l a s s, comments

Start a petition? Run for city council? Organize a boycott? None of those things can silence the voices in your head. Why did McVeigh bomb the Murrah building? What else could he do?
-- Notorious P.A.T., Balloon Juice, comments

Richard Dawkins has called pantheism โ€œa sexed-up atheism.โ€ (He means that as a compliment.)

I love that he feels he has to explain this to his readers. Why? Because if thereโ€™s anything worse than atheism in Douthatโ€™s book, itโ€™s sex. He canโ€™t think of a single good thing about either sex or atheism, and assumes that you the reader would be equally baffled. What a strange world Dawkins must live in, where getting laid and sleeping in on Sundays could be considered anything but hell itself.
-- Ross Douthat and Amanda Marcotte, "Okay, Avatar sucked, butโ€ฆ," Pandagon

Me and Obama parted company on that shithead homophobe mailorder catalogue preacher that he had at the inauguration If the nitwits are his backers, good luck asshole.
-- Less is better, Hullabaloo, comments

The problem is voir dire. In most of the world, the idea of letting lawyers and the judge cherrypick a jury is flat out insane. On its face, voir dire cannot be expected to work. In the rare case that the two sides are equally matched, we'd expect no net result; in all other cases, we'd expect the better player to stack the jury in his favor. Thus voir dire is a method of systematically biasing the jury. And that's voir dire on its face. It is really a three-handed game with the prosecution, defense, and the bench working in concert against the citizenry to purge the jury of the wrong kind of people, to wit, people who have no faith in the police, the judicial system, lawyers of any kind, or judges. Slip up and let one of those people get on the jury and you can bet your bottom dollar you will never get a conviction, unless the judge bounces the troublemaker and replaces him with a ringer from the already-vetted alternates. This is why we get juries who want to convict. The jury pool itself is biased in favor of conviction, so even without voir dire, the jury is seriously biased. Voir dire is there to weed out the miscreants that don't want to side with the government against their fellow citizens. Good Germans only, please.
-- Rose Colored Glasses, Dispatches from the Culture Wars, comments

It's a sad day when the Evangelicals aren't keeping up. I'd have given high odds on an Antichrist meme, but it hasn't happened. I blame anti-depressant abuse.
-- srv, Balloon Juice, comments

If someone like Palin were truly "conservative", wouldn't she be furiously against trashing the environment of the beautiful state of Alaska? Wouldn't she be trying to sink every supertanker before it got there? Why don't conservatives want to conserve the environment? In practice, it seems like conservatives can't destroy it fast enough to be happy. They pretend to revere the 1950s, but push for development and sprawl that guarantee that small-town values are wiped out. And the "be fruitful and multiply" thing.
-- cat_named_zoe, Sadly, No!, comments [My dad is a conservative greenie, so I can tell you they do exist. -- ?!]

I had one grunch, but the eggplant over there.
-- Perception Management, Hullabaloo, comments

We heard this over and over during the run-up to the war, and in the aftermath of 9/11, after the 2004 election and gay marriage bans, and during every important fight of the past decade: If only the people who cared about the outcome of the debate most would shut the fuck up and calm down and not be so unforgivably and uncouthly invested in it, things would be fine. Stop giving right-wingers ammunition. Stop giving them excuses. Stop protesting. Stop running ads. Stop being loud. Stop embarrassing me the good little progressive who's doing it right.
-- Athenae, "It's Always the Left's Fault," First Draft

Don't tell me to make a compromise that, in the same situation, you would not make and, funny enough, were not asked to make because it's never The Man being told his vasectomy won't be covered or his Viagra won't be covered or his prostate surgery won't be covered. Is it. No, it's women...time after motherfucking time...who are told that our reproductive health care must be uniquely regulated, despite legality, by The Man...and that we, despite our needs and that same curiously overlooked egality, must take one for the team...again.
-- Shark-Fu, "There must be a line...a wall to hit...or the struggle for reproductive justice is merely a suggestion.", AngryBlackBitch

This is how you subjugate an entire population. You convince them that they will be punished even beyond death for disbelieving and disobeying, and you convince them to be happy about it.
-- RamblinDude, Pharyngula, comments

I'd probably hate christmas a bit less if I was any good at it.
-- tomble, chat, 21 December 2009, 12:18PM EST

For the past 30 years, "conservatism" has focused on telling people they can have whatever they want. That's not what "conservatism" meant before 1970 or 1980. My father was a conservative in the old mold. What it used to mean was "not being wasteful". Conservatives were people who didn't just automatically move to a bigger house or buy a fancy new car every year just because they had more money - they were people who were by nature frugal or conservative in the way they spent their money. One of the things I learned from my parents that really stuck was "don't be wasteful." That has stayed with me - to this day I buy a new car every 10 years - and drive it for 10 years. My recycle bin fills up faster than my garbage can. I generally don't buy things I don't need. Compare and contrast with today's "conservatives", to whom the word means, "drive a Hummer and burn as much gas as possible," "buy a McMansion in the suburbs," or, in case of national attack, "go shopping." It used to be "buy war bonds." But that was back before the GOP was in the business of telling people who will never have much of anything that "yes, you CAN have it all - the only reason you don't already is because of TAXES that go to minority leeches who won't work." They've turned it on its head - these days, support of "conservatives" is supposed to free you of actually behaving like one, as if being fiscally prudent and non-wasteful is some kind of punishment and voting for "conservatives" will free you of the drudgery of having to live within a budget.
-- Jennifer, Sadly, No!, comments

[D]id Ceiling Cat have a pet Jesus? As support for this position, who opened the cans for Ceiling Cat?
-- Martin, Balloon Juice, comments

If you put single payer out there tomorrow you'd have a solid majority in favor and you'd have every pundit and halfbright mummy's boy with an Ivy League degree opining that the 10 percent screaming with teabags are really the sensible ones in America.
-- Athenae, "What We Got," First Draft

Don't be churlish. Prophet Brownian predicts that God will begin to heal amputees precisely as soon as medical science develops the ability to regrow limbs.
-- Brownian, OM, Pharyngula, comments

[T]he surveys show that large numbers of people have effectively ceased to believe that man-made global warming is taking place, and this is profoundly ironic because at the same time the evidence has hardened up to a startling degree. And the science of man-made global warming is now as solid as the science linking smoking with lung cancer and HIV with AIDS. And it seems to me that the harder the science becomes, the more people fall into denial because they simply don't want to face the writing that's now on the wall.
-- George Monbiot, interview on Lateline, at abc.net.au

Any reality which would have Orly Taitz in it has clearly jumped the shark and is in desperate need of having its Etch-a-Sketch shaken upside down.
-- El Cid, Sadly, No!, comments

At the end of the film, every single girl was crying. One of the boys said, "What, are you gonna cry" and as he said so, his voice cracked, and he made a huffing sound to keep his own tears from leaking out. When it was over, a girl came up to me and said "Could I call my mother?" "What for?" "To tell her I love her." The students asked for the name of the movie. They wrote it down. They asked where they could buy it on dvd. They wrote it down. They loved "Grave of the Fireflies," just as I had at that age. They were unbelievably kind toward each other throughout the day. But had I commited a thoughtless, stupid error? When their teacher found out what I had done, she went straight to the principal, and banned me from her classroom.
-- Peter Fawthrop, Roger Ebert's Journal, comments, on showing Grave of the Fireflies to a class of middle school students

The lefty fringe is just aching, PINING for some lunatic who logged onto the Freeper website to start blowing people away.

Just out of curiosity, you are aware that that has already happened, not just once, but probably several times this year alone, right? You are aware of James Von Brunn, Jim David Adkisson, and Richard Poplawski? And i take it you're cognizant of the fact that most people on the left and center left weren't all that pleased about any of them? In fact, most of us regarded these incidences with a mixture of dread and loathing? I mean, it's kinda hard to accuse people of 'pining' for something that's already a reality. Unless, of course, you're pretending that something that is an objective truth doesn't exist because it wouldn't mesh with the 'sports team' narrative you've decided to arbitrarily squeeze reality into regardless of historical and political fact. The one where your team rules, regardless of what ever miscreants and deranged lunatics happen to be on it? And which completely disregards, as a matter of course, all the actual pain, suffering and lives lost you have to wave away as irrelevant in order to sustain your childish narrative?
-- Sanka and Uriel, Balloon Juice, comments

I was very struck, when I had my daughter - she's now nine - by the way girls seem to be expected from birth to live in this world of tutus. I was brought up in the late 60s and early 70s, with a mother interested in gender-neutral education, and I had just kind of assumed that things would have moved on from there. In fact, they've moved backwards. The view seems to be: 'Oh well, people tried, in the 60s and 70s, they tried all that non-sexist, anti-stereotyping stuff, and it didn't work. There's obviously nothing we can do about it, it's all laid down in our genes.' Whereas in fact that's not true: we never got the equality we set out to achieve. And now we all have to accede to the notion that little girls are naturally drawn to pink, and you're old-fashioned and over-serious and boring if you suggest otherwise.
-- Natasha Walter, quoted in The Guardian

Can we stop using the term "civil liberties"? Let's just say "liberty" instead. It makes it read more effectively, like substituting the term "lawlessness" for "deregulation".
-- dAVE, Hullabaloo, comments
 

12/29/09 11:06 pm - [info]feministing_rss - What We Missed.

Can we leave Chris Brown alone? The answer is no.

The University of Tennessee still uses "hostesses" to attract football players. Ew.

A horrible fire in Mississippi kills 9 including a lesbian couple and 6 of their children. Tragic.

An extensive piece by Latoya on gaming and gender. Read it.

Also, as a treat to myself after completing my MA thesis (!), I am going to Chile for two weeks with friends so I will be back after the new year. Happy New Years Feministing community and here's to another year of feministing away!

 

12/29/09 09:33 pm - [info]feministing_rss - Race does not determine criminality.

I can't tell you how terrifying it is to learn that a plane flying into an airport less than 30 minutes from your apartment -- on Christmas morning, no less -- has been targeted by a terrorist. It's almost as frightening as learning that the kind of man that would put on an underwear bomb is getting medical treatment at the University you attend, minutes away from your home. But none of these things scare me more than how civil liberties, of the racial variety, have become expendable in the past week. Despite my fears, I fully reject racial profiling as a means to prevent terrorist attacks on American soil.

Race and nationality are simply inadequate as deterministic factors in gauging one's criminality. People of many different races have committed acts of domestic and international terrorism or have been guilty of possessing weapons of mass destruction. As recent as 2003, a white man plead guilty to possessing a weapon of mass destruction.

Inside the home and storage facilities of William Krar, investigators found a sodium-cyanide bomb capable of killing thousands, more than a hundred explosives, half a million rounds of ammunition, dozens of illegal weapons, and a mound of white-supremacist and antigovernment literature.

Many people probably didn't hear about this incident. And in a vast majority of the coverage I have seen, there was no mention of the racial or religious identity of the couple involved.

Yet, the recent coverage of Abdul Farouk Abdulmutallab mentions, even stresses, his Nigerian identity as if it is related to his criminality. It's pertinent to the facts to mention his point of departure, Nigeria. However, the harping on Abdulmutallab's Nigerian identity has made the identifier "Nigerian," in a matter of days, synonymous with terrorist.

It's worth noting that our mass media usually doesn't do this when reporting on suspects that are "Caucasian," "American," or "Christian" who are involved in acts of domestic terrorism. Three notable mass shootings were committed this year by Michael McLendon, Robert Stewart and George Sodini. Very little was mentioned about their race or faith in relation to their crimes.

And it shouldn't have been.

Many of the same proponents of racial profiling would think it's ridiculous for us to observe these 3 unique cases and conclude that all white males, for example, should be subject to additional surveillance in America because whiteness and maleness are factors the cases have in common. If we acknowledge that these associations are preposterous, we have to say the same for suspects of international terrorism. Further, few have acknowledged that racial profiling may have very well misdirected our energies regarding Abdulmutallab. Let's face it: if we have followed public sentiment on racial profiling after 9/11 and made one's brownness a factor in terrorist targeting, it might have contributed to why someone that looked like Abdulmutallab went under the radar.

What is clear at this point is that there is no evidence that racial profiling is effective at apprehending terrorists. What's not to be missed is that our country would fare better using numerous factors in gauging criminality -- that actually have to do with criminality. Warnings to the US authorities from people's relatives come to mind.

12/29/09 05:31 pm - [info]archangelbeth - The Weekly World News is archived on Google books

http://books.google.com/books/serial/ISSN:0199574X?rview=1&lr=&sa=N&start=0

If the GMs reading my LJ/DW journal can't figure out that the covers alone are gaming gold, I despair of the world.

12/29/09 04:59 pm - [info]archangelbeth - Still sick, maybe getting better.

It's frigid here. 13 or so when we got home, and the wind is howling out there. Guh.

Mouth still a little sore, but no longer screaming into my fist from my tooth rubbing against the sore.

Did I mention I hit below 125K (barely)? Except now spouse is reading it and complaining about some of the contractions. Especially when Iathor uses them. My emulation of Iathor is feeling vindicated and slightly sulky that I'm not going and fixing all his speech back towards the pedantic. (On the other hand, ze spouse caught one bit which might be waxing a little long on Expository Text.) (...great, now I have a betrayed character emulation sulking in my backbrain.)

I'm puttering on the formerly third, now second book. Whee.

[profile] incandescens, thank you for DVD! *hugs*

INwatch: Core Rules: 446, Lilith: 379, Eli: 359, Liber Umbrarum: 224, Litheroy: 217, Asmodeus: 191, Infernal Player's Guide: 123, GURPS In Nomine: 82, Zadkiel: 72 (no change for 1 day), Liber Canticorum: 29, Game Master's Guide: 20.
Adventures: City On Fire: 116, Strange Bedfellows: 93, Feast of Blades: 92, The Rats' Revenge: 86.
Free Adventures: A Very Nybbas Christmas: 4132, The Sorcerer's Impediments: 2692.
Not IN: Sahudese Fire Drill: 77, GURPS IOU: 62, GURPS Classic All-Star Jam 2004: 61 (fell off the bottom). Not IN or mine: Vorkosigan Saga Sourcebook and RPG: 228.

Darling Holly Dorkface Adopt one today! Adopt one today!
Dragons under fold )

12/29/09 09:44 pm - [info]ylla - The year in first lines

working my way through the end of year memes )

12/29/09 03:35 pm - [info]muckefuck - Ho ho ho

So after ranting about something trivial and irritating and moping about something morbid and serious, I'm feeling a strong need to post some life-affirming crap. Anyone sick of stories about darling toddlers yet?

Everyone was healthy this year. (Well, aside from Baby OGI Blair-vomiting over his mom in the middle of a dice game, but even with a fever of 101, that child is more sweet-natured than any number of healthy toddlers I've known.) You'd never know some of the health scares we'd been through in the past twelve months. Some people could be in better places with regard to mental health, but everyone's getting along and there was no drama worth mentioning. In particular, the extended family Christmas party was much more fun than I expected it would be, given who was not there this year. My uncle's wife and sons were very much in evidence, and people were being extra considerate toward them without any hint of oversolicitousness.

Speaking of that party, more people there asked me amount [info]monshu than in the previous ten years or so of our relationship. This was no doubt due to his name appearing in my grandmother's obituary--something I never expected to see in all my days. And among the stories circulating about grandma was the Christmas party over a decade ago when she sidled up to the bar, asked for a bourbon and sweet (much to the amazement of her sons, who had never heard her order a drink before--she'd never had to while her husband still lived), and then turned to Nuphy and asked him what had attracted him to me. (This was the infamous conversation in which he used the word "sensuous"; only now do I find out it was even worse than he revealed to me at the time.) I know it makes me sound like a geezer to say so, but this is a sort of solid gradual progress I thought I'd die without ever seeing.

Let's see, what else? Oh, after I mentioned my gingersnap experience to my sister, she revealed her possession of Dad's recipe and pretty much the very first thing we did upon arriving chez elle (well, after downing some potato soup and rescuing my indestructible phone from her magpie child) was bake up a batch. No sooner had they cooled than she froze a bag, a bag which even now sits on the kitchen counter waiting for me. She didn't get half her usual baking done this year, but she knew that was important to me and prioritised it. (In some sort of nostalgic convergence, [info]monshu's sister sent him a tin of the date cookies he kept telling me his mom used to bake every year. Madeleines for everyone!) Even better on the food front, I was forced to down only one meal concocted from ingredients of questionable vintage in my mother's kitchen, and not much of that.

And then there was my promised initiation into the world of Wii. My sister set me up with some balance game where you snarfled fish that I tanked at and then some ski jump game that almost didn't suck at. (I'm blaming the fact that she wasn't able to create a new avatar for me and, thus, I was forced to compete as a freakishly bloated and top-heavy version of her.) I was only the second worst in the bowling champion ship (or third best, if you choose to look at it as I do) and ended up with a sore arm, but that was totally worth it because I got it from doing training screens where you clear more and more ludicrously huge frames of pins and the older boys thought that was awesome. They were shouting out "91 PINS!" which a glee I didn't anyone that young could have for a vicarious experience.

12/29/09 04:30 pm - [info]keristars

According to a package I received today, the Internet lives in Kentucky! :O GOOD TO KNOW.



Also, lol, I was super efficient at typing up the list of names of all the files we're sending to the data center, and my supervisor told me to go home an hour and a half early. I won't get paid for that hour and a half, but I don't really mind, because I need to take a nap.

I decided to name my new music player Maa-kun, after the Orange Planet kitten in ARIA. Alice names it Maa-kun because the sound it makes is 'maa' and, well, 'kun' for a cute little thing with unknown gender (Maa turns out to be a girl). Maa is very tiny and adorable, you see, and my music player is also tiny and adorable, so the name fits! I almost named it Monkey, but that's kind of difficult to say when I'm digging for it in my bag. You know "dangit, Monkey, were are you hiding now?!" I think Maa is easier to mutter. Also, Maa-kun is an adorable little kitty. I mean, considering that Kozue Amano draws really weird cats.

This is Maa-kun and President Aria. Maa-kun things President Aria's fat white belly looks like a marshmallow or something, idek, so is always glomping President Aria. It's a running joke. It's a good example of how inexplicably weird Amano's cats are. I mean, what the hell President Aria? but you get use to it pretty quickly. At least I did. And now I think they're all adorable.




Oh! And I forget why I decided to try it out, I think I got a recommendation somewhere, but I just saw the first episode of the 2004 (?) series Windy Tales the other night. It's done in a different art style than anything I've ever seen, with lots of polygons and flat shading, but it looks really beautiful. And it has really pretty music, too. Oh, that's right- I think it was a rec because of my love of ARIA. In the first episode, Nao is a middle or high school student (I'm not sure - they all have that indeterminate anime age look to them) who likes to take photos of clouds. But one day, she sees a cat on the roof next to her, and tries to take a photo of it with the clouds in the background, only the cat starts to fly? And the wind knocks Nao off the ledge, but instead of falling to her death six storeys below, she sort of floats down softly. And it turns out that one of the teachers at the school can control the wind (just like the cat) and saw her fall and saved her. AND WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?!?! I've only seen the one episode, so I dunno, except that I think Nao and her friend learn to control the wind, too? The next episode is about them going to the teacher's house, which is in a village amongst other people who can control wind, and they're having a wind festival or something. I think it's another slice-of-life, slow-paced story. So it's best to not watch more than one episode a day.

The art startled me at first, it looks kind of like early computer graphics, but more polished with softer colors, and somehow there's a feeling of shape and form even though the polygons are kind of flat and there's hardly any shading at all. I like the way the people are drawn, with teeny tiny hands and feet - their limbs are like cones - except that they're not always tiny - like if perspective/foreshortening calls for larger hands, then they are. And the girls' bodies are round and soft looking, again despite the angular polygon shapes. I dunno, my description sounds like it's really stupid, but it looks really nice, actually! In fact, it's one of my favorite art styles. here's a pretty example from Vera Brosgol, And here's another, which has girls in underpants and visible nipples, but is totally cute and probably still SFW

12/29/09 04:23 pm - [info]riordon posting in [info]ag_over_18 - Photo Album "The Meeting"

I made a photo album in my journal. I thought you would like it.

12/30/09 04:30 pm - [info]rysmiel - November books post

books read, November )

12/29/09 03:50 pm - [info]riordon - Doll Album "The Meeting"

I made a photo album about my new doll. photos behind lj-cut )

12/29/09 12:40 pm - [info]rephetibel - Fixed it!

It was the connecting piece that was the problem. I don't know why, it was the right size. Anyway, I found a connector in the shop and tried it instead. No drips!
 

12/29/09 08:22 pm - [info]languagelog - The notes of Candace's complaint

Commenting on "Three-syllable Mom" (12/28/2009), Brooke observes that

You can hear a genuine three-syllable "Mom" in the opening title sequence of the kids' television show, "Phineas and Ferb." The character Candace says,

"Mmm-MO-om, Phineas and Ferb are making a title sequence!"

The pitch matches the stress, low-high-low. The first syllable is brief but clearly discernible. I suppose one could argue that it's not a true syllable, since it lacks a vowel, but the word is certainly three distinct beats.

Thanks to the magic of YouTube, I can bring you the audio (performed by Ashley Tisdale) as well as a still of Candace in mid-complaint:

A pitch track of the "Mom!" part shows that there are indeed three notes, though not really three syllables (or three "beats"), since the first pitch is clearly limited to the initial [m] (just as Brooke describes it).

(Click on the image for a larger version. The mis-tracking of pitch at the edge of the high note may be in some sense real, being caused by some laryngealization that may actually cause temporary period doubling.)

The pitches are roughly 250, 614 and 464 Hz, which (relative to A 440) are approximatly b, d#", and a#'. (Given those values, the first note is about 18 cents sharp relative to a concert A, the middle note is about 22 cents flat of tempered concert D#, and the third note is about 8 cents flat relative to tempered A#. But different choices of measurement points or regions would give different numbers.)

Here's a plot for the "Phineas and Ferb are making a title sequence!" part of the complaint, where there are (what I take to be) two more replications of the same pattern:

Contrary to the opinions of several commenters on the earlier post, there's no sign of a rise on the final note, either in the "Mo-om!" phrase or in the "…title sequence" phrase.ย  That agrees with my own impressions about this pattern. But they may be right about their own variants — I repeat my earlier call to send me audio clips, either of other renditions in popular culture, or in your own performance.

12/29/09 02:15 pm - [info]bifemmefatale posting in [info]bipolypagangeek - help the robinsons! act now!

Science Fiction author Spider Robinson's wife Jeanne is fighting cancer and they're both fighting to pay the bills. 100% of any money used to purchase Larry Santoro's excellent e-book, "Lord Dickens's Declaration," will go directly to the Robinsons. Here's the link: http://www.starshipsofa.com/shop/lord-dickenss-declaration/

Dec 31st is the last day that people can buy Larry's story. I'd like to end the fundraiser with a bang. Let's get the word out all over the web to let people know on December 30th, there's only one day left to help. Why December 30th? Because if there's only one day left people won't put it off and say, "I'll do it later. I still have time." Make sure you link to the purchase page!

If you've got a blog, please use it. Tell your friends that are into speculative fiction ahead of time and ask them to blog as well. And let's ask the big boys to mention it, like BoingBoing, Gaiman, Scalzi, VanderMeer and whomever else you can think of. One last big push to help some good people in a bad situation.
 

12/29/09 07:02 pm - [info]feministing_rss - All the Single (Beige*) Ladies!

I guess it shouldn't surprise me that ABC New is running articles about the ills of single ladies, since they have several stories/videos about "crazy cat ladies," but I am of two minds about this piece about single, black, successful ladies. The premise of the piece is an attempt to look at a potential racial divide between when black women get married and when white women get married.

From the video:

Forty-two percent of U.S. black women have never been married, double the number of white women who've never tied the knot.

and

For starters, there are 1.8 million more black women than black men. So even if every black man in America married a black woman today, one out of 12 black women still wouldn't make it down the aisle if they hoped to marry a black man.

and

What "Nightline" looked at were the large numbers of professional black women who have groomed themselves for success with B.A.s, M.D.s and J.D.s. Seventy percent of them are still without the more elusive title: M-R-S.

Fear-mongering statistics aside, it is frustrating to read this. I realize that watching this through my feminist lens is frustrating because ABC News is reducing these women to letters and numbers, ignoring the role that socialization has on women to feel they need to get married. Where, after all, are the specials on panacea around single men? Those stories would look different, if produced at all, and I think reducing it to biology is too simple (aka the biological clock). The reality is many men want to be in stable relationships as well.

But if I am to look around at women I know including successful women of color, they do want to get married and while I don't necessarily agree with that desire on their part, I am their friend and I too am on the mean dating circuit and can most certainly feel their pain. Factors such as racism and displacement have forced our communities apart in ways that are reflected in dating and marriage.

So how do we reconcile this tension? Perhaps the most frustrating part of the story is when Steve Harvey "relationship expert" chimes in about how all these ladies are "fine," so it is crazy they are single. Get it, they look nice, it doesn't matter if they are educated and successful. Oh and they are overlooking good guys, so it is probably their fault. And Harvey hits the nail on the head without realizing he does--irrelevant of your successes in life, you have to put that behind you if you want to find a man. Men don't have this same pressure, they can be as choosy as they want if they are successful and even sometimes when they are not. This would be why heteronormativity sucks.

Wise Diva chimes in over at her blog,

Perhaps I am a bit oversensitive to this kind of thing because I obviously fit the single, black, female criteria. I just wonder why a person's career success should automatically translate into success in finding a mate. Did I miss something?

I know there are friends of mine of many races and backgrounds that have a desire to marry, but I don't get the sense that they feel entitled to it simply because they have achieved success.

Whenever I hear or read stories like this, I have to really wonder, what is the point of tossing out the "forty-two percent" have not married statistic. Then they take it further and highlight the difference as "double the number of white women". Seriously?

Similarly, I think that is what frustrates me about the media constructed panics around single black women, a parallel I think that can be drawn for women of color, more generally. Historical reasons such as racism, colonization, migrations and culture have made the ways our lives form different. Becoming successful in America comes with it not only financial success, but white weddings and 2 kids and 2 cars and a dog and a cat. It comes with it assumptions about your sexuality which make illegible that fuzzy space where people that may not fit those molds exist. I realize my proposition is radical, but I think we really need to push past the idea that the only way to be a legitimate "woman" is to be married and allow people the cultural freedom to feel comfortable in the space they are in.

And just for reading all of that...go on and have a dance break.

*the origin of the single beige female.

Powered by LiveJournal.com